Exposed: Burnham – Why Antonia Romeo?

This is why Burnham wants to create a new (unlawful) law.

 

https://traitor666.blogspot.com/2015/06/your-toxic-tap-water-fluoridation-scam.html

THE TRAITOR WITHIN: Your toxic tap water - The fluoridation scam

“A nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious but it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable… The traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself… He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist.” (Cicero)

~ Cicero Marcus Tullius~ Born January 3,
106 BC and murdered December 7, 43 BC

 

The Hidden Power Behind the Romeo’s

Antonia Romeo’s rise to influence is rooted in a web of elite connections and ideological backgrounds that reveal a deeper agenda. She studied at the London School of Economics (LSE), an institution historically linked to Fabian socialism and Marxist ideas, which continues to influence globalist circles today. Her husband, John Romeo, is a Cambridge-educated managing partner at Oliver Wyman, a firm actively involved in the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “Great Reset” initiatives and closely connected to the Rockefeller Foundation.View profile for John Romeo

Starmer set to appoint Antonia Romeo as first ever female Cabinet Secretary

Together, their influence extends into the highest echelons of global power, working towards a future where national sovereignty is diminished and societal control is centralized under elite international interests. Understanding these connections is crucial to exposing the true scope of the agenda behind her rise. A report has also come to light, written by an Anonymous Civil Servant dated 02/02/2021, where it is stated: 

Antonia’s DIT Legacy

“The most disturbing aspect of Antonia’s legacy at [Department for International Trade](DIT) is a woke department filled with people rapidly promoted above their ability on politically-correct grounds to their next level of incompetence. The Department for International Trade is not fit for purpose and this is due to the fact that Antonia Romeo is a graduate of Common Purpose wokery who took little interest in international trade. She did not even know who Richard Ricardo, the founder of modern trade theory, was when she was appointed Permanent Secretary for the DIT….”

Recent developments within the UK government threaten to dramatically undermine democracy, sovereignty, and the future of Western civilization itself. Power brokers, like PM Andy Burnham and globalist elites, are maneuvering to pass legislation that could establish Dame Antonia Romeo in a de facto dictatorship. This law, reportedly set to be pushed through under the parliamentary act that allows for ‘automatic assent,’ was exposed by Elisabeth Beckett here  as unconstitutional bypassing circumventing  the British Constitution. The new law aims to give Dame Antonia Romeo the power to issue binding directives to all government departments, bypassing elected ministers and transforming the civil service into an unaccountable ruling elite. It will no doubt be pushed through under the unconstitutional “Parliamentary Act 1911,” which effectively removed the power of the monarch to read and approve bills before they become law.  As Elisabeth Beckett, a renowned expert on the British Constitution, explains in her article “Lady of 83, Student of the British Constitution”:

“That Act is to this day illegal, but the words used to destroy the Lords were the same words used to get rid of the Queen’s authority. Our constitution is clear: We the people hold the power (we are a democracy but we are also a Constitutional Monarchy). The power of government and giving Assent to Bills is given to the Queen, the Royal Prerogative, to govern in our name and according to the laws we have established to prevent her or Parliament from taking over power. Unfortunately, this has been done both in the 1911 Parliament Act and in the Reform of the Constitution Act of 2005 when Blair and Lord Falconer took over the power we had given to the Queen for her lifetime. They then gave Parliament the right to decide whether to go to war instead of putting that power under our laws, which state we cannot go to war unless we are under attack.”~ Elisabeth Beckett

This statement highlights how constitutional principles have been systematically undermined, deliberately eroding the authority of the monarchy and bypassing the legal and constitutional safeguards designed to protect the sovereignty of the people. Now, with Burnham moving to introduce an unconstitutional law, the full extent of this agenda – planned over a century ago by the Fabian Society, becomes clear. The 1911 Parliament Act, enacted when Marxists, socialists, Fabians, Sinn Féin, and the Liberal government under Asquith took the power of taxation from the King and removed the scrutiny of the Lords, allowing the party in power to act without oversight or control.

The Power Grab and Globalist Crisis

Critics argue that this move undermines parliamentary sovereignty and democratic oversight, paving the way for a technocratic dictatorship, an unaccountable ruling class that operates beyond the democratic will of the people. The legislation signifies a broader shift toward centralized, unelected governance.

Implications include:

– Democratic institutions would be hollowed out, replaced by an unaccountable administrative elite.

– Britain could become a puppet state controlled by globalist interests.

– This is a dangerous step toward a globalist new order—an unaccountable, unelected ruling class with control over societies worldwide.

Who is Antonia Romeo? Her Education and Ideological Background:
Romeo studied at the London School of Economics, founded in 1895 by Sidney Webb and supported by Beatrice Webb—prominent members of the Fabian Society, known for promoting socialist and Marxist ideas. Critics see the LSE as a hub for Fabian socialism, influential in shaping elite policy and worldview. Her civil service career spans key roles across governments from Tony Blair to Keir Starmer. She has served at the Ministry of Justice, the Department for International Trade, and the Home Office.

Cabinet Secretary and head of the Civil Service Dame Antonia Romeo (left) listens as Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer talks.

19 Feb 2026 Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has appointed Dame Antonia Romeo as cabinet secretary

In 2024, she was awarded the Damehood, an honor critics argue was politically motivated, given her ties to the political and globalist establishment. While serving as British Consul-General in New York, Romeo faced management misconduct allegations, accusations of bullying staff and improper expenses. Although investigations found no criminal misconduct, these reports cast doubt on her judgment and leadership style, raising questions about her suitability for such an influential role. Globalist Connections and Elite Networks – Romeo’s education at the LSE links her to an institution long associated with socialist and Marxist ideas. Her husband, John Romeo, with a master’s degree from Cambridge, is a managing partner at Oliver Wyman, a firm deeply involved in WEF initiatives and partnered with the Rockefeller Foundation.

Oliver Wyman, John Romeo and the WEF

 

a person wearing a suit and tie

Thank you to Lord Mayor William Russell for granting me the Freedom of the City of London on Friday. Although born in the USA, I have spent the majority of my life living and working in London, and this city is my home. Over the past two years it has been a privilege to lead the Oliver Wyman Forum team working with the City of London Corporation and its many stakeholders to develop a vision for London 2025. Really this honour is for that team – thank you to them. This is a city of opportunities, of talent, of culture, learning, and business that combine to create an attractive place for businesses to invest and people to live and work. I am extremely proud to call myself a new #Freeman of one of the greatest cities in the world. #citizen #freedomofthecity #london #oliverwymanforum #CityofLondon Lisa Quest Elizabeth Hoyler Andrew Bailey Rupal Sachdev Kantaria Kaijia Gu Crispin Ellison

John Romeo’s role places him at the heart of global influence networks. The firm has collaborated with the WEF on societal restructuring projects promoting the “Great Reset,” including digital IDs and societal control mechanisms. Romeo’s  work and affiliations exemplify a powerful, interconnected elite network working toward a future where sovereignty is diminished and societal control is centralized, posing a direct threat to national independence and freedom worldwide.

The Broader Globalist Agenda

The Rockefeller Foundation’s collaboration with the UN and WEF aims to dominate science,health, and environmental policies, pushing narratives that erode sovereignty and individual freedoms. Their ultimate goal? To create a society where people own nothing, with digital IDs, surveillance, and societal engineering replacing traditional nation-states. Implications for the “Free World” – The erosion of UK sovereignty under influence from globalist elites sets a dangerous precedent for the Western alliance. The ongoing crisis of mass migration, deliberately exploited, destabilises communities, strains social services, and diminishes national cohesion, making societies more susceptible to international influence and societal restructuring. If the UK installs unelected rulers like Romeo, it accelerates the decline of Western independence, with elites owning and controlling everything, while the people own nothing.

The Constitutional Breach and the Role of the Monarchy

Since the 1911 Act, critics maintain that all bills passed into law have been unlawful because the constitutional process has been bypassed. Both the previous and current monarchs have breached their coronation oaths, which bind them to uphold the constitution and safeguard the sovereignty of the people. Traditionally, the monarch is seen as the embodiment of the sovereignty of the people, holding what is known and forgotten as the fiscal prerogative—a vital contractual link between the monarch and the populace, granted for life.

The 1911 Act* effectively removed the monarch’s role in reading and approving legislation, eroding the constitutional principle that sovereignty and ultimate power lie with the people, who exercise it through their right to elect Parliament. Critics argue that these breaches and procedural shortcuts undermine the constitutional order and threaten the foundation of democracy.

The Legislation and the Threat of a Technocratic Dictatorship

The legislation Burnham seeks to implement, pushed through under the unconstitutional “1911 Parliamentary Act”- is designed to grant Dame Antonia Romeo extraordinary powers, enabling her to issue binding directives across government departments. This move, exposed by Elisabeth Beckett here, violates constitutional principles, undermines parliamentary sovereignty, and circumvents democratic oversight.

The move signifies a dangerous shift toward unelected, unaccountable governance – a hallmark of the globalist push for a new world order.

A Fight for Sovereignty and Democracy

The planned legislation, the connections of Dame Antonia Romeo to globalist institutions like the Rockefeller Foundation and the WEF, and the unconstitutional bypassing of constitutional processes signal an alarming assault on national sovereignty and democracy. The UK must resist this encroachment.

The sovereignty of the people must be restored, and constitutional principles upheld. We are at a critical juncture where awareness, activism, and firm resistance are needed to prevent the rise of a technocratic dictatorship and preserve freedom for future generations. Our sovereignty, freedoms, and very cultural  identity are at stake. Vigilance and decisive action are crucial, before it’s too late.

Above:
Mrs Elisabeth Beckett handing over a letter to a Police Sergent in Penrith, Cumbria 200, asking the Chief Constable
to protect her rights under the Constitution.

Elisabeth’s last letter to the Queen

The following is Elisabeth’s last letter to the Queen, written before she died.

Her Majesty The Queen
Buckingham Palace
London SW1A 1AA

21 January 2009

“Madam

Unconstitutional reign

Giving careful consideration to the mode of address in this letter, although in courtesy I have addressed it in conventional manner, it is clear that having, in effect, abdicated by failure to perform your coronation oath you leave the people of this nation without in effective a titular head to whom we may address our petitions. I write to you only in your pre-eminence in Common Law.
I write on Edmund Burke’s remark that for evil to flourish it is sufficient for good men to do nothing.

At your coronation you swore on oath to rule this country according to our laws and customs. This contract with us was written clearly in Magna Carta and replicated by Edward I in 1274. After saying that he would give no such oath, the archbishops, bishops, barons and freemen said that, in this case, they would get another king.

In Magna Carta it was made clear that if the monarch went against this Oath then chapter 61 would apply, the contract would be broken and the monarch would have to give up his position and possessions. You have, throughout your reign, disregarded our laws and customs in the legislation that has gone through Parliament.

I believe that you have done this on the basis of the Fabian inspired Parliament Act of 1911 which argued untruthfully that since Royal Assent had never been denied by a monarch since 1707 (when Queen Anne sent back a Bill) the use of the Royal Assent had fallen into abeyance. This claim was untrue and treasonable. Only the year before, Asquith had been forced to go to the country by Edward VII who sent back the same bill to Parliament. And indeed monarchs had refused assent on at least six other occasions since 1707. On each occasion this refusal of Assent was because the bills concerned breached our constitution.

In other words, the 1911 claim, is incorrect and the monarch’s Assent was never and can never be deemed unnecessary or automatic, even though George V chose to accept that the Royal Assent was now a formality and that the monarch could not, in reality refuse Assent – as in the Northern Ireland Bill.

Despite all the long years of your reign this method of agreement, either forced on you, or under “automatic Assent” nevertheless cannot be upheld as lawful.

Many people who have written to you on constitutional matters have received replies from your secretary (most recently, Sonia Bonici) saying that their letter had been forwarded to the government department misleadingly called the Department of Constitutional Affairs and Ministry of Justice. Your compliance with this has permitted the judiciary under these government departments to claim, as in the Chagos Archipelago appeal, that our fundamental liberties do not exist and that the peoples of these islands have no rights under our law.

I am old and now seriously ill. I cannot die without making it clear to you that you have broken your oath to us your people.

The 1911 Act purports to permit taxes to be levied on us merely by a majority in the House of Commons and without reference to the upper chamber. This again is against our Constitution and specifically not permitted by our Petition of Right of 1627. The most serious instance of this is the use of our taxes to fund the banking system of this country: this is being explained to the electorate as a step which will in some way make us rich, whilst in fact it is not only unlawful, but a most serious abrogation of our rights and your duties under our Constitution.

Your contract with the people of this country and the colonies and dominions cannot be destroyed by the chicanery of the Fabians in the 1911 Act, nor by subsequent legislation. If you have the courage to fulfil your contract, however belatedly, you could prorogue Parliament now and have a free election with or without party divisions so that this country can go forward in a proper and united way to remove us from the difficulties that have ensued since the 1911 Parliament Act.

Yours faithfully,

Elisabeth Beckett”

Copy to:
The Archbishop of Canterbury

No response was received.

Additional information:

Fabian Society and the New Age movement: A Common Purpose

 

Tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.