Prologue: Honoring Britain’s Sacrifice; Preserving Its Memory as Our Homeland’s Freedom and Culture Come Under Siege by an Insidious, Permitted, and Hidden Invasion
Let us never forget that in 1944, British fishermen, Royal Naval Reserve personnel, and Allied sailors served aboard minesweepers and requisitioned fishing trawlers. In the months before and during the D-Day landings, they carried out the dangerous task of sweeping mines and marking safe channels through the English Channel and off Normandy. Over 300 Allied minesweepers participated, and many experienced crews contributed their maritime skills, exposing themselves to mines, enemy aircraft, and naval attack, to ensure the success of Operation Neptune, the naval phase of the invasion. This should not be confused with the equally valiant civilian effort of the ‘Little Ships’ during the Dunkirk evacuation in 1940. See example below
When the British Expeditionary Force was cut off from France by a German pincer movement, Winston Churchill called it the greatest military defeat in centuries. With troops trapped on the beaches and shallow waters preventing destroyers from approaching, civilians and their vessels played a heroic role in evacuating approximately 338,000 soldiers. Over 800 boats, including yachts and fishing vessels, risked everything to save Britain’s soldiers and their country. For what?
Today, the very waters they fought and sacrificed their lives to protect are being breached daily by illegal crossings facilitated and permitted by our own ant-British government that has turned its back on those who fought and died over centuries to maintain OUR sovereignty. The very waters; once symbols of resilience, are now exploited by invaders. Many surviving veterans and their relatives have expressed their horror and belief that the millions who sacrificed their lives were in vain, especially as the freedoms they fought for are now under threat and erosion. They believe their countries, Britain and Europe, have been reduced beyond recognition, their very essence and sovereignty deliberately diluted, undermined, and betrayed.
GB NEWS The Late Show Live | Sunday 6th September
GB Late Night Report by Ben Leo on Portsmouth Invasion exposing the dramatic escalation of migrants into Portsmouth, where hundreds of protesters have gathered in response to a recent large boat arrival carrying over 140 migrants; far from the “small boat” description, reflecting the increasing scale of these crossings. The migrants were swiftly brought ashore at Langston Harbour, a strategic location away from the city’s historic naval base, which would have been highly symbolic. The landing has sparked widespread unrest among local residents, with protesters blocking roads and forming a blockade to prevent the transportation of migrants to Kent’s Manston facility, which is a three to four-hour coach ride away.
It was also reported on GB News that a charity had been given advanced warning of the crossing into Portsmouth and that the country had seen 600 invaders, with coaches awaiting their arrival, and more boats were expected last night. These crossings, along with others, are aided by our government, which refers to the invaders as “customers.” A tent was set up with provisions donated by the charity, indicating prior knowledge and planning. In fact, evidence suggests that the charity and NGO were aware of the boat’s approach beforehand. A disturbing video shows that they had already set up tents, had clothes, pajamas, and resources ready, socks, flip-flops, brand-new tracksuits, T-shirts, pants, and pajamas- presumably in biodegradable bags, waiting for the migrants’ arrival. The footage indicates that these supplies and tents were prepared well in advance, suggesting that the NGO was tipped off about the crossing before it even launched.
The demonstration was peaceful; however, the Home Office responded with a harsh, black-lash reaction to GB News, referring to the protestors as THUGS. The only appearance of thugs was the anti-British police sent in with RIOT GEAR to intimidate and prevent local residents from defending their REALM peacefully. Furthermore, a whistleblower described the entire process as “infantile” and claimed that staff had been instructed by managers to refer to asylum seekers as “customers.”
A Maritime and Coastguard Agency spokesman said: “In response to a report on September 6 of a small boat heading towards the Hampshire coast, HM Coastguard sent lifeboats, a HM Coastguard helicopter, a HM Coastguard aeroplane, and HM Coastguard Rescue Teams. Border Force, Border Security Command, Hampshire Police, and South Central Ambulance Service were also sent.”
[Who is paying for this?]
The question echoes across the report, highlighting concerns about the resource and financial costs of these operations.
The British government has condemned the recent protests, stating: “Government condemns ‘thuggish’ behaviour in Portsmouth after second small boats protest of weekend.” But on-the-ground reports and footage reveal that the demonstrators, estimated at around 500 and largely composed of locals, are peaceful and motivated by frustration over what they see as the government’s failure to secure borders and protect communities. Many protesters dressed in black, similar to those who participated in protests at Dover, but most are ordinary residents exercising their right to voice concerns.
Ben Leo emphasises the symbolic importance of Portsmouth, historically linked to Britain’s Royal Navy, as a key site for the latest crossing route, marking a new phase in migrant landings designed to challenge authorities and test border responses. The protesters’ actions, including blocking the only road off the island city, underscore the rising tension and public discontent with unchecked illegal migration.
The report features strong commentary from Paul Cox and American commentators, who commend the protesters’ peaceful yet firm stance and highlight the widespread dissatisfaction with government policies. Cox, visibly annoyed, sharply refutes the government’s characterization of the protesters as “thugs,” condemning the authorities for dismissing genuine community concerns and attempting to misrepresent peaceful demonstrations as disorderly. He emphasizes that the protesters are ordinary residents exercising their right to protest, and that calling water splashing or peaceful sit-ins “thuggish” is absurd.
Further, the report exposes the absurdity of some official narratives, notably a ridiculous and outlandish claim from a former Labour advisor from Spain, who dismisses the protests as “thuggish” and attempts to justify police actions by suggesting that the protesters are a threat to public order. This advisor’s comments are widely ridiculed as disconnected from reality, as she claims that the peaceful demonstrations and even water splashing between police and protesters are “thuggish,” despite clear evidence to the contrary. Leo sharply rebuts her remarks, emphasizing that the protests are peaceful, legitimate expressions of community frustration, and that the police response has been restrained and appropriate. Calling water splashing or sitting peacefully “thuggish” is absurd and dismissive of genuine concerns.
It is also crucial to recognise that we are being gaslighted by our anti-indigenous British government, which seeks to distort reality and suppress the truth about these invasions and their devastating impact on our homeland. Whilst the realm and its origins are being invaded, diminished, and destroyed, our treasonous monarch King Charles, unlike his predecessors (but not predecessor), claims to defend his country, yet he and his son, Prince William, remain unacceptably silent, permitting and even enabling acts of treason on these Isles. It is utterly inconceivable that our British Monarchs would have reacted in such a pathetic, servile and submissive manner to an invasion of their shores.
We, the British people, are demeaned, disarmed, and diminished, stripped of our dignity and sovereignty.
Our right to defend our homeland is being deliberately removed and undermined by bureaucratic politicians who are anti-British and pursuing an NWO agenda aimed at transforming Britain (and Europe) through invasion, subversion, and cultural erosion.
Adding to this, a recent investigation exposes the true nature of many so-called asylum seekers. A Home Office whistleblower, known only as “J,” has claimed that just one percent of asylum applications are genuine, revealing widespread fraud and dysfunction within Britain’s asylum system. He also alleged hundreds of Pakistani applicants had claimed to be in a gay relationship with the same person, who provided “hundreds upon hundreds of very obviously fake letters of support”. He alleges that applicants frequently submit strikingly similar accounts (“package claims”) and that the process allows dishonest applicants to manipulate the system by delaying interviews and preparing fake evidence.
J further criticises the system’s inefficiency, stating that applications are often approved within half an hour, while rejecting a case requires significant effort. He describes the process as “infantile” and claims staff are instructed to refer to asylum seekers as “customers,” reflecting a culture of providing a service to migrants rather than protecting national interests. This exposes the reality that many of these “asylum seekers” are not genuine refugees but rather invaders exploiting a broken system.
In contrast to the sacrifices made to protect our waters, we out now witnessing this:
A DECEPTION: How Benevolence Conceals the Agenda Behind an Invasion
In this context, the rhetoric that portrays migration as a humanitarian act, used by globalists as a façade, must be recognised as part of a broader agenda. This narrative of innocence and support is a cover, an affront that masks the true purpose: undermining Britain’s sovereignty, eroding national identity, and facilitating an invasion. Benevolence and charity are being weaponized as tools to deceive the public and mask the true nature of this crisis. Moreover, this rhetoric has been carefully developed and employed since the last war, as part of a long-term strategy of Deliberate Dumbing down of the population, a concept extensively described by Charlotte Iserbyt. This includes manipulating education systems to coach the public into accepting the changes that globalists aim to bring about. It is evident that globalists have meticulously refined and tailored their media and messaging strategies, employing covert NLP techniques and common purpose language to brainwash the public into believing in a moral obligation of compassion. Without their support and compliance, the agenda could not have been managed. It is also noteworthy that numerous charities are being created and used, such as this one, to push and legitimise this agenda. This psychological manipulation forces ordinary citizens to accept and even advocate for what is, at its core, an existential lie, an orchestrated invasion disguised as a humanitarian effort, designed to weaken and fundamentally transform our nation from within.
Home Office whistleblower exposes ‘massive fraud’
SURPRISED – NO – protected uncover invasion – YES
It is evermore likely that the actual figure is far less, perhaps as low as 0.1% not 1% – think about it.
This will be throughout EUROPE pushed by the UN AGENDA – (UN replacement migration ) where a bigger picture lies awaiting to be exposed by the Mains Stream media such as the BBC et el who remain compliant and complicit.