Judith’s Article Namaste Magazine Vol, 12 Issue1
Judith Reisman successfully spent an entire career laying the foundations for the deconstruction of ‘the Kinsey myth’. Her work, uncovering and documenting systemic perversion by well-funded efforts in academia, politics, business and media, sheds light on what spawned the ‘sexual from birth’ dogma and helped pollute our classrooms and institutions, our print and broadcast media and, indeed, the internet.
Judith’s Article Namaste Magazine Vol, 12 Issue1
Alfred Kinsey his Minions Continue Child Sex Abuse
Judith Reisman successfully spent an entire career laying the foundations for the deconstruction of ‘the Kinsey myth’. Her work, uncovering and documenting systemic perversion by well-funded efforts in academia, politics, business and media, sheds light on what spawned the ‘sexual from birth’ dogma and helped pollute our classrooms and institutions, our print and broadcast media and, indeed, the internet.
Judith’s Article Namaste Magazine Vol, 12 Issue1
In Sexual Sabotage, Dr. Judith Reisman, the pre-eminent Kinsey whistle blower, returns to tell the story of how the ‘K-Bomb’ was launched from a gothic limestone Indiana University building, its time-released detonation set to silently emit erototoxic radioactivity into our atmosphere – unto
the generations. see page 71
By Dr Judith Reisman, PhD
Publish Namaste Magazine Vol. 12 Isue1
While President Obama and Hillary Clinton apologize for the American scientists, Kindsey who conducted vicious sex experiments on Guatemalans, the followers of the American scientist responsible for the rapes of thousands of infants and children continue his child abuse legacy untainted.
The Kinsey Institute just announced its collaboration with another agency of sex and “condom use,” using nearly 6,000 subjects. The new Kinsey study continues its old drum beat: ‘Sex’ any way and wherever you get it.
My latest volume, Sexual Sabotage, documents the Kinsey team’s sexual crimes inflicted on up to 2,035 infants and children. After five decades denying its sexual abuse of babies and children for Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953), in 1998 the Kinsey Institute again published both books without apology for these barbaric child sex crimes.
Riding high on their fame and fortune, in 2003 Kinsey pedagogues then distributed another sham child sex guidebook, “Sexual Development in Childhood.”
Now, this October, (2010) Kinsey’s Institute continues its tradition of lying about sex and children in yet another ‘sexual health survey.’
Funded by Trojan condoms’ ‘Church & Dwight Co.,’ Kinsey’s minions claim condoms are comfortable and safe for child and adult use.
Using the Internet for its survey, Kinsey’s ‘researchers’ say they ‘interviewed’ people from age 14 to retirees age 94. The Trojan team claims they found teenagers use condoms much more than adults and that seven percent of females and eight percent of males click ‘gay, lesbian or bisexual.’
Sex studies are seldom valid
The leftist ‘sexologists’ note that since 1994 people have more multiple sex partners, including the elderly. The survey, of course, ignores the doubling of STD rates among older adults ‘in less than a decade’ and the price in taxes paid for engaging in ‘multiple’ sex partners.
‘Researcher’ Dr Dennis Fortenberry says they aim to show that ‘everything in there is normal,’ knowing that what people think is normal is viewed as harmless.
Yet, before the Trojan company paid to ask 14-year-old children to describe their alleged sex lives, Dr. Fortenberry admitted that sex studies are seldom valid.
Our history as [sexuality] professionals over the past 100 years has been to be wrong more often than we’ve been right. … I’m just very nervous about succumbing to the temptation to speak as arbiters of normalcy.
‘Sexual Development in Childhood’
One-hundred years of bad sex research defines sexology as an unscientific sex cult, not a ‘profession.’ However, by this October, Fortenberry’s Trojans seemed to relieve his anxiety and nervousness.
Instead he wrote ‘as arbiters of normalcy’ saying ‘fourteen percent of 14-year-old’ boys and nine percent of girls had sex. The Trojan study ignored what percent was forced – since the government data find 64 percent of forcible sodomy victims boys under age 12 with girl victims even more common.
Kinsey’s Trojans say ‘about 70 to 80 percent’ of sexually active youths said they used condoms in a last ‘intercourse.’ Of course, while the ‘study’ merrily finds sodomies ever more common, it ignores condoms as rare in non-intimate sex.
In this author’s research, mainstream homosexual journals seldom market condoms while the only purportedly safe ‘pouch style’ is ignored by ‘gay and bisexual men by HIV prevention organizations.’
So what is not in a sex study is as important as what is.
The Kinsey Institute’s personal and financial ties to pornography (funds from Playboy) means that pornography in sex is ignored despite its role in sexual mayhem, crime, divorce, child abuse, etc.
Fortenberry’s colleague Debra Herbenick, responsible for much of the ‘woman’ sex data here, seems pleased that sex is increasingly solo, via ‘partnered’ solo sex and sodomite. She reports one-third of women have pain during sex, but doesn’t say if the pain is due to marital coitus or to sodomite conduct – as one doesn’t see the companion’s eyes. Are the eyes no longer the window to the soul or do the ‘researchers,’ who do not mention it, find ‘love’ irrelevant to sex?
In their Kinsey Childhood book, Herbenick asked children about ‘unwanted sexual experiences with adults,’ not about ‘sexual experiences with adults.’ Strange! Since children are commonly told they ‘wanted’ sex with adult predators, as a typical Kinsey clone, Herbenick’s data trivializes child sex abuse, also counting only children under 16 as abused, and only if the offender is over ‘five years older.’
Like magic, Kinsey’s Herbenick OKs all ‘wanted’ abuse and abuse of children over age 15. (Eighteen is commonly the legal age of consent.) She also pried children about consensual sodomite conduct. No Kinseyan ‘Childhood’ participant challenged Herbenick’s invasive, unreliable, unscientific queries or later untoward effects on her child ‘subjects.’
Fortenberry (who admitted sexologists are more wrong than right) is newly pleased that the ‘data’ find condoms don’t impede pleasure and ‘have become normative’ for children. Kinseyans, paid by pornographers and Trojans, find ‘data’ similar to Big Tobacco’s scientific studies that proved cigarettes too were harmless pleasure.
Unfortunately, all institutional sex ‘researchers’ are Kinseyans. What is ‘normative’ about sex is that researchers and respondents both lie (for fun or profit). This would include the alleged high rate of condom use ‘among black and Hispanic men.’
These newest Kinseyan ‘findings’ will support more bogus HIV-AIDS, homosexual schoolroom propaganda – and Trojans – to cruelly brainwash children.
FINALLY EXPOSED
Claiming the study was a nationally representative sample of adolescents and adults’ repeats Kinsey’s lies. His ‘subjects,’ prisoners, sex offenders, homosexual radicals, pedophiles and prostitutes, were relabeled a ‘random sample’ of World War II Americans – a lie that crippled our nations sex laws and our lives.
Until their blood-curdling criminal history is finally exposed in our courtrooms, legislatures and the court of public opinion, the Kinsey crusade to destroy the normal love lives of Americans, and thus our self-governing moral power, continues unchecked.
The Kinsey Institute must be investigated!
“Dr. Reisman’s study supports the conclusion that Alfred Kinsey’s research was contrived, ideologically driven and misleading. Any judge, legislator or other public official who gives credence to that research is guilty of malpractice and dereliction of duty.”
Charles E. Rice, Professor, Notre Dame Law School
“The Kinsey reports (one in 1948 on males and the companion five years later) claimed that sexual activity began much earlier in life…. and displayed less horror of age differences and same-sex relationships than anyone at the time imagined. It was as if, to follow Mr. Porter again, ‘Anything goes’. In Kinsey, Sex and Fraud, Dr. Judith A. Reisman and her colleagues demolish the foundations of the two reports … Kinsey et al … questioned an unrepresentative proportion of prison inmates and sex offenders in a survey of ‘normal’ sexual behavior. Presumably some at least of those offenders were also the sources of information on stimulation to orgasm in young children that can only have come from pedophiles–or so it must be hoped. Kinsey…. has left his former co-workers some explaining to do.”
The Lancet, (Vol. 337: March 2, 1991, p. 547)
Dr. Judith Reisman is sought worldwide to speak, lecture, testify and counsel individuals, organizations, professionals and governments in Media Forensics, the scientific analysis of images, pictures, cartoons, illustrations, pornography and text in sexual harassment of women and children in the workplace, schools and homes. Her Media Forensic expertise has been successful in child custody cases, examining ‘pseudo-child’ and ‘virtual-child’ pornography, as well as in judicial and legislative decisions about a) fraudulent sex science, sex education and b) the way in which media images restructure human brain, mind, memory and conduct by hijacking rationality. The special emphasis of her Media Forensic research has been and continues to be the scientific documentation of the difference between public and private space human erotic displays, and the subversion of informed consent via exposure to supranormal visual stimuli.
Dr. Judith Reisman, Scottsdale, Arizona
For more information on lectures, workshops, media appearances, consulting, or to order books:
Email: jareisman@gmail.com
Website: www.drjudithreisman.com
Donations
One of the best ways to support Dr. Reisman is to buy some of her books and donate them to your local library, school teachers and professors, law enforcement professionals, media, judges, lawyers and politicians. And she would like to thank those who have already done so very much.
Dr. Reisman’s ‘institutional’ funding comes only from The People. To support Dr. Reisman directly, please send your tax-deductible donation using the PayPal link below. PayPal also accepts credit cards, without the need to have a PayPal account. http://www.drjudithreisman.com/about_dr_reisman.html#cd
Please contact Dr. Reisman for information on other ways to donate.
Namaste Notes:
As you will read below, once again the hidden hand /footprints of the Rockefellers can be found in its drive to destroy the very essence of humanity.
the Rockefeller Foundation
A Digital History
Descriptions of Kinsey’s work frequently comment on his interview techniques. NRC Committee member George Corner volunteered as an interview subject in order to familiarize himself further with the project. In a memorandum that followed the interview, Corner remarked:
These experiences made me quite confident that Dr. Kinsey is able by his methods of questioning, to elicit frank, full and complete histories of sex conduct. The expertness of the questioning becomes even more apparent on thinking it over afterward. In the first place, the subject is made to feel that Dr. Kinsey is disinterested and sympathetic at the same time. It is disarming to be asked innocuous questions first – what work, for example, one’s father did, and where did one live in childhood. The intimate questions slip in sideways and by degrees. When at last the subject realizes that he is speaking of things he perhaps never put into words before, he is relieved to find that his questioner evinces neither surprise, amusement, nor condemnation.[1]
The scope and promise of Kinsey’s work elicited great interest from RF officers, perhaps none more so than Alan Gregg, then Director of Medical Sciences. Gregg supported and encouraged Kinsey. The relationship between Kinsey and Gregg was so strong that in 1947 Gregg agreed to write an introduction to Kinsey’s forthcoming publication.
Alan Gregg
Publication and Reception
Sexual Behavior in the Human Male was a commercial success that ignited the ire and interest of the scientific community as well as the general public. While many reviews praised Kinsey’s findings, others were quite critical of his work.
Some psychiatrists complained that Kinsey, as a biologist who had previously focused on insects, lacked the requisite background to understand the complexity of the sexual issues he studied. In a letter to Gregg, psychiatrist Lawrence S. Kubie wrote of Kinsey that “… the main defect is that he has not understood the problems of sex deeply enough even to know what the questions are which should be asked in such a study.”[2]
Other academics questioned Kinsey’s methodology and argued that his interview subjects did not come from sufficiently diverse backgrounds. Those willing to be included in the study were most often white and college educated, while religious conservatives, working class whites and African Americans were under-represented. Critics argued that probability sampling, which uses smaller but more representative samples, would lead to more accurate conclusions. Kinsey argued that a greater number of subjects led to better conclusions. In response to these criticisms, the RF sent a team of statisticians to Indiana University to review Kinsey’s methodology. While Kinsey and the statisticians agreed on a number of points, Kinsey rejected the recommendation that he work with smaller sample groups.
Given the commercial success of Kinsey’s first publication, the RF questioned whether the project merited further funding. Writing in his officer diary, Gregg noted the uniqueness of the circumstances – never before had a grantee produced a best-seller whose royalties dwarfed the grant that helped produce it.[3] Based on the book’s earnings, Gregg warned Kinsey that further grants were unlikely, since the Foundation would expect that royalties would be used to produce further work.
Internally, Gregg suggested a gradual decrease in support for NRC sex research. When Kinsey heard of the plans, he contacted Gregg to argue for continued support, writing that the “[d]iscontinuation of Rockefeller Foundation support at this juncture of our program will be taken by the population at large as a vote of no confidence in the research.”[4] Kinsey further outlined aspects of the project requiring additional funding, including data yet to be published.
Letter from Alfred C. Kinsey to Alan Gregg, 1949 April 2
In May 1949 members of the RF board agreed to continue NRC support for the next three years. Stating his approval for the decision, RF Trustee Walter W. Stewart wrote to RF President Chester Barnard:
Personally I have no doubt as to the wisdom and appropriateness of continued support for the work of Dr. Kinsey. Even though some of the publicity attending the publication of his Report may have been unfortunate, the Foundation is not responsible for that. It is not improbable that these studies in the field of sex may come to be regarded as one of the great contributions of Foundation work. As you point out in your letter, work in this taboo area is certain to arouse emotional attitudes. I am glad the Committee did not let this consideration prevent it from granting the additional financial support called for in the resolution.[5]
In 1953 Kinsey published his second volume, Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. This volume, which dissected the sex lives of American women, provoked even more interest and outrage in the general public than did the previous one. The book also became a political weapon. Published in an era of suspicion and anti-communist hysteria, the Kinsey reports were used against the RF in congressional investigations. Citing Kinsey, one congressional committee accused the RF of helping to weaken American morality, thereby aiding the cause of communism.
Both worn down by the controversial nature of Kinsey’s research and influenced by Kinsey’s financial success, RF funding for sex research projects came to an end in 1954. While Kinsey’s royalty profits were considerable, he scrambled to find alternative sources of funding after the RF withdrew its support. Kinsey died in 1956, leaving much of his research unpublished.
[1] Memorandum by George W. Corner, January 24, 1946, Rockefeller Archive Center (RAC), RG 1.1, Series 200, Box 40, Folder 457.
[2] Letter from Lawrence S. Kubie to Alan Gregg, June 16, 1948, RAC, RG 1.1, Series 200, Box 40, Folder 460.
[3] Excerpt Alan Gregg Officer Diary, December 17, 1948, RAC, RG 1.1, Series 200, Box 40, Folder 460.
[4] Letter from Alfred Kinsey to Alan Gregg, April 2, 1949, RAC, RG 1.1, Series 200, Box 40, Folder 461.
[5] Letter from Walter W. Stewart to Chester Barnard, June 10, 1948, RAC, RG 1.1, Series 200, Box 41, Folder 462.