In our first Investigating YouTube Exclusive, we present a testimonial from esteemed researcher on pornography and an expert witness on sexualized content in media: Dr. Judith Reisman. Please write to us at InvestigatingYouTube@protonmail.com if you would like to contribute or provide a testimonial of your own – or use the form on our website at InvestigatingYouTube.com
Dr. Reisman’s Final Interview: The Mind Polluters documentary:
Whose values are being taught? This investigative documentary film shows how the vast majority of America’s public schools are prematurely sexualizing children. A fitting tribute to her legacy.
Extract taken from: Instruments of the NWO established in the aftermath of WWII
492361556-MKULTRA-Kinsey-Rockefeller-Instruments-of-the-New-World-Order
“MKULTRA and Tavistock were only part of a much more significant architecture for whole scale population manipulation being articulated at this time by globalists pursuing the eugenicist dream. Before WWII, American eugenic policies, supported by Rockefeller among many others in the scientific establishment as well as the US Supreme Court,187 formed the model for Nazi sterilization and euthanasia programs which culminated in the holocaust.188 This globalist agenda sets the backdrop to Kinsey’s work within the broader context of the CIA’s mind control experiments. Population control, manipulation of the masses and social engineering form the unifying themes for apparently disparate RF “philanthropic” scientific projects The agenda of the global eugenicists can hardly be called a “conspiracy”; they made no attempt to hide it. It is quite apparent, for example, in the work of Sir Julian Huxley. In the aftermath of WWII, Huxley was elected as the first Director-General of UNESCO. UNESCO’s Constitution states:
“Since wars begin in the minds of men and women, it is in the minds of men and women that the defenses of peace must be constructed.”189 In his paper entitled UNESCO Its Purpose and Its Philosophy (1946), Huxley explains the fundamental task of UNESCO this way:
[UNESCO] is to help the emergence of a single world culture, with its own philosophy and background of ideas, and with its own broad purpose. This is the first time in history that the scaffolding and the mechanisms for world unification have become available … two opposing philosophies of life confront each other from the West and from the East … You may categorise the two philosophies as two super-nationalisms; or as individualism versus collectivism; or as the American versus the Russian way of life; or as capitalism versus communism; or as Christianity versus Marxism; or in half a dozen other ways. The fact of their opposition remains and the further fact that round each of them are crystallising the lives and thoughts and political aspirations of hundreds of millions of human beings. Can this conflict be avoided, these opposites be reconciled, this antitheses be resolved in a higher syntheses? I believe not only that this can happen, but that, through the inexorable dialectic of evolution, it must happen – only I do not know whether it will happen before or after another war.
A prominent member of the British Eugenics Society, Huxley was its president from 1959−62. He was also a member of the World Federation for Mental Health, Director of the Abortion Law Reform Association, and founder of the World Wildlife Fund. (The first president of this fund was the former Nazi, Netherlands’ Prince Bernhard, who also organized the globalist Bilderberg meetings from the inception of this group in 1954). Throughout the twentieth century and continuing to this day, the same names recur within the numerous organizations founded or financed to further the globalist agenda. The Rockefellers and their Foundation (1913) contributed to many others, among them the Council on Foreign Relations (1921), the Tavistock Institute (from 1934), the United Nations (1945), the Population Council (1952); the Bilderberg Group (1954), the Club of Rome (1968), and the Trilateral Commission (1973). In turn, these have generated a dizzying array of NGOs and international co-operatives, which provide the means by which the Rockefellers and their co- conspirators continue to transform their enormous personal wealth into political power. Very often, this power was not overt. The apparatus of national government – whether Communist, Fascist or Democratic – ostensibly continues to operate as advertised. However, behind the scenes, through judicious “philanthropic” expenditure, installing their own men in strategic positions of influence and blackmailing or eliminating opponents, the cabal has been able to manipulate governments to their own ends, directing public policy and public funding to support their globalist agenda and increase their enormous personal wealth still further.191 This, then, is the“monolithic and ruthless conspiracy” of which John F. Kennedy was speaking before his assassination – a conspiracy “that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day.”
Derided as “conspiracy theory” when convenient, this work is at other times openly
acknowledged by significant members of the cabal. David Rockefeller, for example, recorded in his Memoire (2002):
“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
Ostensibly the goal is the collectivism prioritized in both Marxist and Fascist political systems and increasingly encouraged through public education systems in liberal western democracies. By persuading the population to comply (and to ensure their neighbors comply) with whatever imperatives are declared to be incumbent on a good “global citizen”, the globalist cabal use control of information, social psychology, and fear to pressure the population into surrendering their freedom and, as Aldous Huxley phrased it, “to love their servitude”. Only when this “Ultimate Revolution” is complete can the elite oligarchy rest secure. We will be utterly oppressed – effectively reduced to the status of domesticated animals (again, to use an analogy used by Huxley) – but for our good. The plan has advanced in plain sight, effectively camouflaged simply by its sheer scale and audacity.
Section 3: How to take over a democracy by stealth
Sections 1 and 2 have examined the history of Kinsey and his work in the context of a wider,
global agenda to develop scientific techniques to control humanity in order to introduce a new world order, controlled by an elite oligarchy of the genetically superior. Section 3 will now turn to exploring the question of how it has been possible for such a conspiracy to remain hidden and thrive in a liberal western democracy.
If democracies are designed to counter recognized human frailty with mechanisms to ensure
authority is held accountable, how has such a system been turned to serve the interests of the few, without attracting the attention of the many? How has the infiltration and manipulation of every aspect of life influenced by government policy − the academy, the law, medicine, education, etc. – been achieved, while the public is kept in ignorance? Clearly, the capacity to suppress suspicion
More than simply keeping nefarious actions secret, control of the media endows its owners
with the ability to manipulate the entire population. Where control of the media is concentrated in the hands of a small elite, this confers the power to determine what people know and don’t know, what they believe is true or false; what they think is noble or despicable. Once control of information is established, the ability to predict and even direct how people will act, then follows.
In his June 8, 1978, commencement address at Harvard, Solzhenitsyn pinpointed the vulnerability: “The press has become the greatest power within the Western countries, more powerful than the legislature, the executive, and judiciary. One would then like to ask: By what law has it been elected and to whom is it responsible.”194 This section will explore the evidence for Rockefeller manipulation of the US media in support of Kinsey.
Rockefeller forced to take control of mass media
In an epistemological system where Science is the accepted yardstick of ultimate truth, then the ability to pronounce on what is scientifically true confers extraordinary authority. A well marketed truth claim, even one based on scientific fraud such as Kinsey’s, can be inserted into the national consciousness and used to direct the minds and morals entire populations.
The Rockefellers had an early lesson in the importance of dominating the mass media. In 1914, acting in the interests of J.D. Rockefeller, authorities used violence to break the strike of Rockefeller oil-workers in Ludlow, Colorado.195 In what is now remembered as the Ludlow massacre, “Women and children, hiding from the bullets that strafed the camp, huddled in cellars that had been dug underneath their tents. In the evening the National Guard troops soaked the tents in kerosene and set them on fire.”The then free press published this murder of defenseless women and children widely adding fuel to the already significant public outrage against the Rockefellers. Ivy Lee (father of the PR industry) was retained by the Rockefellers to rectify the damage. Acting on Lee’s advice, Rockefeller Junior travelled to Colorado to meet the miners in person and listen to their grievances. This act of public contrition, carefully photographed and distributed to the press, had its intended effect of quieting public hostility. But the Rockefellers had learned a lesson quite different from the one suggested by their demonstration of public remorse. Rather than leaving the future to chance and a free press, they retained Lee’s services for an ongoing public relations campaign to maintain their newly-forged image of benevolence and generosity….”
Source: https://www.thereismaninstitute.org/home
Until her untimely death on April 9, 2021 Dr. Judith Reisman was a lifelong champion for the rights of children. For decades she dedicated her life to combat the increasingly accepted and abhorrent ideology that children are sexual from birth, that they have a right to experience sexual pleasure whenever and with whomever they want, that purity is a false value. She was fully committed to do everything she could to protect childhood innocence, and to do so, she took direct aim at Alfred Kinsey and his self-proclaimed pamphleteer, Hugh Hefner. At one point Playboy sued a TV station in the Netherlands for libel for airing Dr. Reisman’s accusations that Playboy had published child pornography. Dr. Reisman prevailed.