GO TO AND SHARE THIS WEBSITE

https://www.donotconsent.co.uk

DO NOT CONSENT

Download the above letter, print and send to your local MP and a second to the Prime Minister.

ADDRESSES

You can find postal addresses for individual MPs by clicking here, and the address of the Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak below:

The Rt Hon Rishi Sunak MP
Prime Minister
10 Downing Street
London
SW1A 2AA

Download the above Excel document, to find email addresses of all MPs currently sitting. Please do also email the letter to your MP for maximum effect!

JOIN THE MAILING LIST

Send an email to the below email address including your name and you will automatically be added to the mailing list.

join@donotconsent.co.uk

Just copy and paste the email address if you need to.

Please can everyone send their own, and their group’s email names and addresses ONLY to the aforementioned email address.

To clarify, this email address is specifically there to unite and grow us a consolidated database.

There will be no data harvesting, no data sharing and no selling of anyone’s data. This is a protected and secure domain.

DOWNLOAD SOCIAL MEDIA ICON

PRINT OFF AND DOWNLOAD THIS Pdf    aboutgreatbritain-3
AND SEND TO YOUR MP ALONG WITH YOUR DO NOT CONSENT LETTER

See this article and over 100 others on Judge Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com

A Message To, For and About Great Britain
By Judge Anna Von Reitz

Here are some pearls from Ed Johnston—
16th American Jurisprudence Section 177
(16 Am Jur. 2d. Const. Law Sect. 256)

The State did not give the Citizen his rights and thus cannot take them away as it chooses.

The State did not establish the settled maxims and procedures by which a citizen must be dealt with, and thus cannot abrogate or circumvent them. It thus is well settled that legislative enactments do not constitute the law of the land, but must conform to it.

From the 16th American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 177:
“The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:

The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any
purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not
merely from the date of the decision so branding it.

As unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never beenpassed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted. Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power orauthority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it… A voidact cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to
supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, in so far as a statute runs counter to thefundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey anunconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.”
Any court, government or government officer who acts in violation of, in opposition orcontradiction to the foregoing, by his, or her own actions, commits treason and invokes theself-executing Sections 3 and 4 of the 14th Amendment and vacates his or her, office.
__________________

Please note that The Constitution is for inhabitants of the Federal United States LITERALLYthe law of the land— because when they come in from their watery internationaljurisdiction, they are required to operate by the rules established by The Constitution on theland.When reading Federal law, you must always read it from the Federal perspective. Theyoperate in the international Jurisdiction of the Sea, so, of course, the national law they areobligated to respect when dealing with us is –from their perspective— the Law of the Land.It’s the same reversal when they speak of “inhabitants”—- we are “peaceful inhabitants ofthe land” (14th Amendment of the corporate Constitution) from their perspective, whereasthey are “inhabitants” of the “maritime regions and insular states” from ours.

We did not suddenly lose our political status as one of the “free sovereign and independentpeople of the United States” under the terms of the Definitive Treaty of Peace 1783 becausethey called us “inhabitants of the land” in their private corporate “constitution” of 1868—-even though the two different uses of the same word in two completely different documentswas no doubt meant to confuse identities and issues of political status that should neverhave been confused at all.

Why call a corporate “constitution” the Constitution of the United States of America, if youdid not mean to confuse it with The Constitution for the united States of America?

Why call us “peaceful inhabitants of the land” if you did not mean to confuse us with theBritish Subject “inhabitants” referred to in the Definitive Treaty of Peace 1783?

This use of “deceptively similar names” has been carried on throughout the long effort tomischaracterize and defraud the people of the United States by operatives of the BritishCrown and the British government.

How better to undermine our lawful government, if not to do it under a veil of “friendship”and treaties promising “perpetual amity” and while acting in the guise of being our”Trustees” in the realm of international commerce and as our”allies” in war? Who could eversuspect our “Mother Country” of seeking our demise?

Foxes in the hen house doesn’t begin to express the gravity of the international criminalityand breach of trust that we have suffered at the hands of the Federal United States and theBritish Crown and the parade of “Royal Majesties” since Edward VIII stepped down—- andwhat is true for us is also true for Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Germany, India,most of Europe, Ireland, Scotland, Wales…

The Enfranchisement Act of 1867 championed by Benjamin D’Israeli toppled the Englishgovernment from within, engaged Queen Victoria in unlawful acts against the people ofBritain and betrayed their established government all the way back to the Magna Carta.D’Israeli enslaved the people of Great Britain to finance the enslavement of the IndianSubcontinent under the Raj. As long as Queen was going rogue at home and secretivelyenslaving the people of Britain, what did she care about pillaging and betraying her allies inEurope, the Americans, the Australians and a few Canooks?

This is the thanks we all get from the British Royals for our sacrifices and loyalty throughtwo World Wars and countless police actions ever since: press ganging, enslavement, inlandpiracy, unlawful conversion, personage, barratry, and fraud, fraud, fraud.

We are dealing with exactly the same criminality and the same evil that Gandhi faced inIndia, but unlike Gandhi, we are not facing it alone.
In evaluating this deceptive and perfidious Enemy of all free people everywhere, considerthe lack of conscience and morality involved when a government taxes poor people for saltthat they need to live and which they have harmlessly harvested from the sea for millenia?

That’s what the Raj did in India. That’s what the British Crown is capable of.
That is what Prince William’s throne is built upon. It’s not his fault. He is inheriting thesituation his Great-great-great Grandmother left him and he will be hard pressed to makesense of it or find a way forward out of this system of betrayal and criminality without avelvet boot up his backside pointing him the right direction.

It’s our job to be that boot and make sure that this system of things is brought to a peacefuland sane conclusion in which still more innocent people do not suffer. Gandhi and Jesushave both showed us the way to defeat this Evil in high places—- millions of people mustjoin hands and expose the cruelty and criminality and oppressive nature of the Britishgovernment so that it becomes so embarrassing, so obvious, so insurmountably distastefulthat both from within and without the denizens of Westminster are forced to relinquish their
vile claims of ownership and control over the rest of us..
Now that we have identified at least a large part of The Problem, let us quietly anddeterminedly proceed to hold the Lord Mayor of London, the Lords of the Admiralty, and theQueen fully accountable for these outrages against the British people and against all therest of us, too. We were all promised and guaranteed certain things and we all know whatwe have received instead.
As it was in the days of King John, it is again, when the leaders of the people must rise upand demand their rights or lose them, must expose the criminality we have lived with toolong or condemn our children. It is time for the Natural Rights of Mankind to be assertedand for idolatry to end. They may kill our bodies, but they cannot kill our spirits; and theyshall not win.See this article and over 100 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com