The-turbulent-17th-century-Civil-War-regicidethe-Restoration-and-the-Glorious-Revolution
His-Story
Freedom was never given to our British nation on a platter.
There have been many civil wars and battles of these Isles to mention but a few : The betrayal of the Peasants who revolted in 1382, Civil war 1642-1646 to the forgotten slaughter of defenseless protestors in Peterloo, Manchester, to the inhumane torture of the Women Suffragettes. Nothing has changed.
At the binging of the year we posted the following article published last year entitled Millions gave their lives, what did they die for? the title says everything.
Since March 2020, we the British have handed over all our inalienable rights,it happened over a weekend and the vast majority NEVER questioning the lawlessness of the controls now in place and our MP’s have ALL reneuiged on their duties to protect us adding to the the treachery. They should all, but a handful, be sacked and tried for TREASON by the British people for they are in contempt of their obligations to us AND IN BREACH OF THEIR OATH, which has been conveniently been diluted. There is not man a live that has the courage and backbone of Cromwell. He was right when he made his formidable speech in the House of Commons, on the 20 April 1653, as he dissolved the Long Parliament, he said:
“It is high time for me to put an end to your sitting in this place, which you have dishonored by your contempt of all virtue, and defiled by your practice of every vice; ye are a factious crew, and enemies to all good government; ye are a pack of mercenary wretches, and would like Esau sell your country for a mess of pottage, and like Judas betray your God for a few pieces of money.
Is there a single virtue now remaining amongst you? Is there one vice you do not possess? Ye have no more religion than my horse; gold is your God; which of you have not barter’d your conscience for bribes? Is there a man amongst you that has the least care for the good of the Commonwealth?
Ye sordid prostitutes have you not defil’d this sacred place, and turn’d the Lord’s temple into a den of thieves, by your immoral principles and wicked practices? Ye are grown intolerably odious to the whole nation; you were deputed here by the people to get grievances redress’d, are yourselves gone! So! Take away that shining bauble there, and lock up the doors.
In the name of God, go!”
WE need Cromwell to come back
Once again, we have been tricked and have so easily forgotten the Rights of Man for which untold millions have previously fought, struggled to win, and uphold over centuries” time to revisit our previous work with Elisabeth Beckett having published articles about her and her British Constitutional knowledge culminating in her profound message in her last letter to the Queen (21st January 2009) was critical then and even MORE so now in 2021. When nearing her untimely death (just two weeks after her last letter), Elisabeth became desperate to warn the British public of the ongoing shenanigans taking place in Parliament. She was always telephoning and interacting with us at Namaste Publishing UK and a few others, grateful that we were so interested in her knowledge and supportive of her needs to publish the information that she held. She tried valiantly to involve the mainstream press; she even made a stance in court alone – representing herself – refusing to pay her council tax (having discovered it was being used to create Regional Assemblies – part of world government plans). The mainstream media was just not interested. They thought she was just a joke – that it was only about her refusal to pay council tax. This situation displayed their ignorance and blatant disregard for her knowledge. They would not publish her message, just giving minimal space to her refusal to pay her council tax. They only ever gave a limited background to the story. We at Namaste, also contacted the mainstream media re Elisabeth’s story, in the hope they would listen. We explained that there is a serious situation that the UK government and monarch had both committed TREASON. Unfortunately, Elisabeth Beckett’s courageous efforts, with our support and that of a few others, were met in the main, with a typical lack of interest.
We watched in despair and horror as the British public have continued blindly accepting the status quo, being deliberately distracted and marched into a tyrannical world!
British people were and still are FAR TOO accepting of what is very clear to discerning researchers that disinformation, misinformation and blatant lies are regularly published and televised by the media and some social media. People were and still are only interested in their TV programmes, mobile phones and entertainment and did not have the time or interest to listen and learn from an elderly learned woman’s WISE warnings through our magazine as well as other learned souls such as David Bourne, Bob Lomas, Roger Hayes and John Bingley who for many years, have given strong warnings concerning the erosion of British Common Law and our inalienable birthrights which inevitably has lead to the present dangers of creeping draconian rules meshed in with tyrannical powers!
Many still believe, ignorantly, that we don’t have a Constitution! People have been brainwashed into accepting and believing this lie, the teachings of which were deliberately removed from the curriculum in schools long ago. The British Constitution is also no longer taught in UK law departments, education or law schools. Our current state of jeopardy as a nation was finally setup 100 years ago by the Fabians in Parliament with the aid of Prime Minister Asquith with the passing of the Automatic Assent.
Our Constitution states that ‘all laws’ that go through Parliament ‘must have Royal Assent, in order to become law.’ Instead, they are now validated on a false claim that the Royal Assent is automatic. However, the power to grant this is part of the prerogative, which is impassable.
The automatic assent was invented by the Fabian, Prime Minister Asquith who gave the qualification based on the premise that Queen Ann had been the last monarch to send back a bill. The implication being that the monarch could not send back bills, whereas in fact, their power lies in the support of our Constitutional Laws by refusing to give Assent to bills that are unconstitutional.
Many years ago, the late great Elisabeth Beckett’s Plaint of TREASON against the then Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, for signing the Lisbon Treaty, she laid grounds for a lawful challenge regarding our Lawful and Constitutional Constraints which at the time, was being side-stepped furthermore, she exposed how our Constitution still had lawful validity then and indeed STILL does today. Our Fabian styled and run government have for at least 100 years, denied us the all protections laid down by our indigenous ancestors.
HIGH TREASON has been committed against the people of these Isles, Colonies and Dominions by the Sovereign and her government and as such many have knowingly and unequivocally endangered the lives of all British people and colonies globally.
The fact remains; our Lawful and Constitutional Constraints STILL form part of our Laws, it is the only legitimate LAW of this land – British Common Law, this is undeniable and is currently being trampled over by made up rules and statute which are NOT LAW and the Sovereign has betrayed us by breaking her Coronation Oath to protect our laws and customs thus allowing tyranny to be enacted.
Sir Edward Coke said:
“The Royal Prerogative is part of the Personality of the Monarch and could not be taken from them even by an Act if Parliament” which the Law Lords Halbury and Jowitt agree. (Halbury’s Laws, The Birth Right of the People of England – these are legal reference books of great prestige).
With the passing of the 1911 Parliament Act bringing into effect
the AUTOMATIC ASSENT.
ALL aws since then have been passed under the Automatic Assent, whereby the monarch never sees the bills. The Automatic Assent is not part the British Constitution.
Interestingly, The late Prime Minister Asquith is believed to be the unofficial relative from the wrong side of the blanket of Boris’s handler/floozy.
Since the Assent is given under the regal ‘Prerogative Power,’ it is invalid if it is given to an unconstitutional act. So in a different way, both Counsel’s opinion and Elisabeth’s lead to the same conclusion. Therefore, she said that one can conclude that ALL of the bills that have been made law since 1911, which includes 1972 entry into Europe, and all that follows, together with the Civil Contingencies Bill, the Constitutional Reform Act, Equality Act and the Immigration Act ARE VOID.
It is clear that our entry into the European Union is INVALID, ILLEGAL and against our Constitution. (see article page 31, this issue: How Ted Heath and Others Set Out to Subvert The Constitution)
Just look at what ‘they’, the satanic globalists, have “achieved” in ONLY TWELVE years: we the people have NOW arrived in the most evil Orwellian World. Many believed when Brave New World was first published that it was ONLY fiction. How wrong they were. Obviously Huxley knew the plan, they have to show us. Aldous Leonard Huxley was a mason.
How naive people were then and still are today for they cannot see that humanity stands teetering on the edge of the abyss as we fthe few ight for the freedoms of the many – from evil psychopathic criminals. They will not easily give up their power.
We do wish Elisabeth was here today to see what has developed – that her warnings foretold what has now happened. She was a stalwart woman whose determination and strength was likened to that of the leadership of Boadicea. Elisabeth would have led the charge; she would have been out there having been shocked into action – having once held the monarchy in such high regard to finally witness and accept that the British people have been so blatantly and utterly betrayed! This realisation was finally acknowledged by Elisabeth before her death, she was most disappointed and thus forced to accept and admit that the British monarch’s breach of her Oath was a treasonous betrayal of her position.
Please note:
If the past Fabian shenanigans had not successfully overridden the British Constitution with statutes and therefore subverted all our Common Laws, the current situation of an alleged pandemic and the lockdown of Britain, its former colonies and thus the rest of the world could NEVER have occured. Every law since 1911 is UNLAWFUL!
Elisabeth Beckett
(29th July 1924 – 7th February 2009)
“Champion of the British Constitution and fearless advocate of Liberty and Justice”
Above:
2008 .Mrs Elisabeth Beckett handing over a letter to a Police Sergent in Penrith, Cumbria, asking the Chief Constable to protect her rights under the Constitution.
Related Article
https://namastepublishing.co.uk/elisabeth-beckett-her-untold-story/
Elisabeth Beckett – Defender of the British Constitution – Her Untold Story
Published in Namaste Magazine Vol. 10 Issue 2
Student of the British Constitution – 83 year-old Elisabeth stands alone against our TREASONOUS GOVERNMENT
Our Constitution states that ‘all laws’ that go through Parliament ‘must have Royal Assent, in order to become law.’ Instead, they are now validated on a false claim that the Royal Assent is automatic. However, the power to grant this is part of the prerogative, which is impassable.
The automatic assent was invented by the Fabian, Prime Minister Asquith who gave the qualification based on the premise that Queen Ann had been the last monarch to send back a bill. The implication being that the monarch could not send back bills, whereas in fact, their power lies in the support of our Constitutional Laws by refusing to give Assent to bills that are unconstitutional.
Common law
Elisabeth’s Plaint lays the ground for important legal and Constitutional constraints which are being side-stepped and their legal validity is being denied by our present legal system and government. The fact they are still part of our British Common law is undeniable, Sir Edward Coke said, “The Royal Prerogative is part of the Personality of the Monarch and could not be taken from them even by an Act if Parliament” which the Law Lords Halbury and Jowitt agree. (Halbury’s Laws, The Birth Right of the People of England – these are legal reference books of great prestige).
Since the Assent is given under the regal ‘Prerogative Power,’ it is invalid if it is given to an unconstitutional act. So in a different way, both Counsel’s opinion and Elisabeth’s lead to the same conclusion. Therefore, she says that one can conclude that ALL of the bills that have been made law since 1911, which includes 1972 entry into Europe, and all that follows, together with the Civil Contingencies Bill, the Constitutional Reform Act, Equality Act and the Immigration Act ARE VOID.
It is clear that our entry into the European Union is INVALID, ILLEGAL and against our Constitution. (see article page 31, this issue. How Ted Heath and Others Set Out to Subvert The Constitution)
Elisabeth Beckett’s Last letter to the Queen
Her Majesty The Queen
Buckingham Palace
London SW1A 1AA
21st January 2009
“Madam”
Unconstitutional Reign
Giving careful consideration to the mode of address in this letter, although in courtesy I have addressed it in conventional manner, it is clear that having, in effect, abdicated by failure to perform your Coronation Oath you leave the people of this nation without effective a titular head to whom we may address our petitions. I write to you only in your per-eminence in Common Law.I write on Edmund Burke’s remark that for evil to flourish it is sufficient for good men to do nothing. At your Coronation you swore on Oath to rule this country according to our laws and customs. This contract with us was written clearly in Magna Carta and replicated by Edward I in 1274. After saying that he would give no such oath, the archbishops, bishops, barons and freemen said that, in this case, they would get another king. In Magna Carta it was made clear that if the monarch went against this Oath then chapter 61 would apply, the contract would be broken and the monarch would have to give up his position and possessions.
You have, throughout your reign, disregarded our laws and customs in the legislation that has gone through Parliament. I believe that you have done this on the basis of the Fabian inspired Parliament Act of 1911 which argued untruthfully that since royal assent had never been denied by a monarch since 1707 (when Queen Anne sent back a bill) the use of the royal assent had fallen into abeyance. This claim was untrue and treasonable. Only the year before, Asquith had been forced to go to the country by Edward VII who sent back the same bill to Parliament. And indeed monarchs had refused assent on at least six other occasions since 1707. On each occasion this refusal of assent was because the bills concerned breached our constitution. In other words, the 1911 claim, is incorrect and the monarch’s Assent was never and can never be deemed unnecessary or automatic, even though George V chose to accept that the Royal Assent was now a formality and that the monarch could not, in reality refuse assent – as in the Northern Ireland Bill. Despite all the long years of your reign this method of agreement, either forced on you, or under “automatic assent” nevertheless cannot be upheld as lawful. Many people who have written to you on constitutional matters have received replies from your secretary (most recently, Sonia Bonici) saying that their letter had been forwarded to the government department misleadingly called the Department of Constitutional Affairs and Ministry of Justice.
Your compliance with this has permitted the judiciary under these government departments to claim, as in the Chagos Archipelago appeal, that our fundamental liberties do not exist and that the peoples of these islands have no rights under our law. I am old and now seriously ill. I cannot die without making it clear to you that you have broken your Oath to us your people. The 1911 Act purports to permit taxes to be levied on us merely by a majority in the House of Commons and without reference to the upper chamber. This again is against our constitution and specifically not permitted by our Petition of Right of 1627. The most serious instance of this is the use of our taxes to fund the banking system of this country: this is being explained to the electorate as a step which will in some way make us rich, whilst in fact it is not only unlawful, but a most serious abrogation of our rights and your duties under our constitution. Your contract with the people of this country and the colonies and dominions cannot be destroyed by the chicanery of the Fabians in the 1911 Act, nor by subsequent legislation. If you have the courage to fulfill your contract, however belatedly, you could prorogue Parliament now and have a free election with or without party divisions so that this country can go forward in a proper and united way to remove us from the difficulties that have ensued since the 1911 Parliament Act.
Yours faithfully,
Elisabeth Beckett”
Copy to:
The Archbishop of Canterbury
This, like many other letters Elisabeth had sent to the Queen, was never responded to, neither was it acknowledged.
Related Artilces
We the British People and Our Country Have Been Taken Over by People of Foreign Descent Claiming to be British.
We the British People and Our Country Have Been Taken Over by People of Foreign Descent Claiming to be British.
https://namastepublishing.co.uk/how-the-politicians-and-monarchy-have-betrayed-the-british-people/
How Politicians and Monarchy Betrayed the British People
https://namastepublishing.co.uk/ancient-laws-of-constitutional-protection/
Ancient Laws of Constitutional Protection Shattered by TREASON
https://namastepublishing.co.uk/wp-admin/post.php?post=3269&action=edit
Lawful Rebellion Against Treason and Sedition