This is an excellent article, it explains to the many who do not know the TRUE meaning of Royal Assent (it is no longer taught in schools and colleges it has been deliberately removed from the curriculum) so that treason could be committed. TREASON has been carried out in plain sight of the British people, we have been duped and lost all of our freedoms. Sovereignty has been destroyed…read on.
By Bob LomasIf law is to work, it must be simple, straight forward and unambiguous, which English law is. There can therefore be no confusion and no complication. What we are faced with is the smoke and mirrors actions of the politicians all designed to hide their treachery, they are simply ignoring the law and constitutional constraint. They cannot answer questions honestly without incriminating themselves, also, following half a century of lawless parliaments many of them have no idea as to what the law is.Note the weasel words of Mark Hunter MP below.“You will note that the Treaty refers to “Member States- e.g the countries which signed the Treaty remain states in their own right.As for Maastrict , this was not a treaty in its own right but consisted of a series of amendments to existing Treaties, which were principally the Treaty of Rome and the Single European Act.”They might remain member states but in truth they are no more than satellite states of the super state, their laws subordinate to the big brother super state. And how can a treaty in name not be a treaty? As I say, smoke and mirrors and presided over by a monarch who, like the politicians, has reneged on the contract they entered into with the people, by covertly setting aside the law as was discovered in the Metric Martyrs case to its cost and where incidentally, it was made plain by the government prosecutor that the nation’s sovereignty was surrendered with the ratification of the Treaty of Rome.Anne wrote below: “could she really with-hold her Signature to them when our representatives have freely elected them? I think not.”If the Bill put forward for Royal Assent is unlawful or contrary to constitutional constraint the Queen would have no choice but to refuse, as to do otherwise would place her in breach of her coronation oath. George III had no hesitation in refusing, on one occasion PM Pitt threatened to resign if Royal Assent was not given, George III called his bluff.Anne also asks: “Is the Queen “Sovereign? Are the people sovereign? Are those in our Parliament Buildings “Sovereign”. Sovereignty means “Authority” .”Sovereignty means much more than ‘authority’, it means absolute self autonomy. According to our law, the people are sovereign and the Monarch is the physical embodiment of the people’s sovereignty. There is nothing sovereign about Parliament, as it is only a temporary, transient thing, an administration and legislature, nothing more, the only sovereign aspect in Parliament is the people’s Crown within it that maintains the presence of the people in their Parliament, a public institution which the Monarch, as custodian of the Crown, can dissolve on the people’s behalf at any time during its limited lifetime.Derek asks: “Can someone please tell me what the position really is. Did the signing of The Treaty of Rome remove our sovereignty or not.? Are we a Sovereign nation or not?”The position is this. According to our law we are a sovereign independent nation. According to the Queen and Parliament our law is subordinate to foreign law, so we are not. BUT. The surrender of the supremacy of our law could not possibly have been lawful so the Queen and Parliament are holding and maintaining the British people under an unlawful subjugation to a foreign power. This renders Parliament an unlawful institution. Parliament maintains its unlawful position on a ‘might is right basis’ and the naivety, ignorance and incredulity of the mass.We the British people and our country have been taken over by people of foreign descent claiming to be British. Well, they might have been born here but their instincts and dispositions relate to the foreign patterns of behaviour of their ancestral homes.Will we ever again be a free and independent people? It is very doubtful, because we now have at least two generations who have been brought up not to believe in nationhood, or take pride in self achievement.This year we are hosting the Olympic Games, an opportunity to show the world our strengths and weaknesses. Seldom have we seen a national event more dishonest, bent and crooked in its organisation and all sanctioned by our so called national leaders. It follows the Queen’s so called Diamond Jubilee, the biggest charade ever played out in the turbulent history of our system of monarchy. As they say: ‘It’s show time’, and truth and honesty just don’t enter into it.With dishonesty and deceit being the order of the day at the very top, it is little wonder that the mass is increasingly following suit. It is a matter of falling standards of morality, that traditionally were championed and upheld by the Church. The Church however has not been immune to the erosion of left wing influence, the doctrines of which place so called human rights above basic and practical moral principles to the extent that immorality has and is being championed by the Church, in defiance of Christian beliefs and principles..In conclusion the questions raised here which I have addressed so many times before on these pages remind me of the number of times people have written to me in despair at what is happening to our once great country and asking me what they can do to help get our country back. I tell them of course, they then so often write back saying that they know all that, but again ask, what they can do to get our country back?To me the situation is very simple. The Queen and Parliament took it upon themselves to unlawfully enter into foreign treaties that placed the British people under foreign law and put the nation’s security seriously at risk. In so doing Parliament has distanced itself from the people and has become an unlawful despotic power with the full co-operation of the people’s elected monarch.This is not the first time such circumstances have arisen in this country, the previous time it took a civil war and a revolution to resolve the problem.