THE FAKE JUBILEE

 
 
From: Davebarnby@aol.com
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 6:29 PM

 
It seems Bob Lomas is right, but did QEII actually sign ECA72 and Maastricht?
 
It seems that all bills are now signed by someone else. If this is correct then what is she for?
 
A couple of moths ago I happened to flick through The Parliament Channel at the time they were voting on some oppressive Home Office legislation. It went through without dissent.
 
Then immediately after sour puss Teresa May stood up and ratified the Bill into law as ‘Queen Teresa’.
 
Yes, Bob, the Diamond Jubilee is a scam and I shall have nothing to do with it.
 
Anybody like to confirm that Bob is right or not?
 
 
Worth reading Szanne Moore’s feature yesterday:
 
‘I won’t raise a cup of warm wine to this posh pensioer’:
 
 
Dave Barnby
 
 
READ ON:
 
 
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 3:39 PM
Subject: THE FAKE JUBILEE

Dear Editor,
 
THE FAKE JUBILEE
 
Arguably the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee is the biggest Con perpetrated against the British people by the establishment since they were assured that joining what was then called the European Common Market would in no way effect essential national sovereignty when in truth and reality our national sovereignty was surrendered in accord with the principle of the Treaty of Rome to which the Queen signed us up in 1972.
 
In so doing the Queen surrendered the supremacy of the Crown and ended the monarchy. There can be no sovereign head of state in a nation which is no longer sovereign and no governor of a nation which is no longer self governing. The Queen also signed up to the Maastricht Treaty which established her as a citizen of the EU and as such subject to the constraints and obligations of that citizenship. No one can be both monarch and citizen at the same time. Despite the cover up by the British establishment the Queen has surrendered the authority vested in her by the people at the time of her coronation to give Royal Assent to any laws created by Parliament. (Reference the Merchant Shipping Act 1988)The Queen accordingly is no longer constitutional monarch and as we have no other form of monarch the Queen is therefore no monarch at all.
 
In truth Queen Elizabeth II reigned for just nineteen years not sixty. 
 
Yours Sincerely,  Bob Lomas. The Magna Carta Society.

Tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.