911 in Plane Site

.
.
 
Above:  Front view of the Penatgon outer wall before it collapsed
 
“Why was America and the rest of the world not shown the video footage and the photographs of the Pentagon BEFORE the outer wall had collapsed?”
 
By William Lewis

 

 

Whether or not you believe the official story surrounding the events of September 11, 2001, it is impossible to walk away, having seen “911 In Plane Site,” and still believe that terrorists wielding box cutters were the masterminds behind the single most horrific terrorist act ever carried out against the citizens of the US.

 

The producers of “Power Hour Productions” and “BridgeStone Media Group” set out to make a video documentary, using a modern news magazine format, to examine and ultimately expose the falsehoods contained in the official story of what took place on September 11, 2001. What has transpired as a result of these efforts has blossomed into a full-scale battle – not of right as opposed to left, or conservative in contrast to liberal, but simply of right versus wrong.
 

If A Photograph Speaks a Thousand Words,

What Does Video Say?

 What “911 In Plane Site” accomplishes that no other video exposé on September 11th has to date, is that it exposes the viewer to a barrage of news clips from a majority of the mainstream news outlets. The official story of that day was told on live TV by reporters, policemen firefighters, and other on-the-scene eyewitnesses. However, that footage was shown only once on live television broadcasts in the first hours of the attacks and then… it was never repeated. The stories changed, information was enigmatically omitted, and what can only be described as officially prescribed propaganda took the place of indisputable reality.

 The Pentagon

Some of the most damning evidence surrounding the attack on the Pentagon centers about substantial and incontrovertible video and photographic evidence which prompts viewers to ask crucial and essential questions. After all, the laws of physics cannot be suspended or can they?

One question many viewers ask is, “Why was America and the rest of the world not shown the video footage and the photographs of the Pentagon BEFORE the outer wall had collapsed?” Many people do not realize that the outer wall of the Pentagon did not collapse until 33 minutes after the initial impact of what we were told was a Boeing 757. Upon examining these photographs, one can clearly see a hole, which is only 16 feet in diameter. This begs the question: “How can a Boeing 757 which is over 44 feet in height and 124 feet in width simply disappear without a trace into a hole that is only 16 ft. in diameter? Why is there no external damage to the Pentagon where the wings and the tail section would have impacted with the outer wall?”
 
Contrary to the video footage shown to the American public, photographs taken only moments after the impact show no wreckage on the lawn of the Pentagon. Where is the plane? Where are the tail, the wings, the luggage, the seats, the landing gear, and the engines? Most importantly, what happened to the passengers who were aboard that plane? America remembers the photographs that they were shown of tiny, indiscernible fragments, which were described as pieces of a Boeing 757. Were these fragments of a Boeing 757? Internal photographs of the Pentagon taken by Jocelyn Augustino, a FEMA photographer, do not show engine parts matching the description of a 757’s engine turbofan according to John W. Brown, who happens to be a spokesman for Rolls Royce. Pratt & Whitney and Rolls Royce manufacture the engines used on these jetliners. The turbofans themselves are approximately 7 feet in diameter. The FEMA photos show what appears to be a turbofan that is approximately 3 feet in diameter. This better fits the descriptions of eyewitnesses who claim that they saw what could only be described as a commuter plane capable of holding only 8 to 12 passengers. This single piece of evidence also helps support other reports from witnesses such as Lon Rains who said “I heard a very loud, quick whooshing sound. I was convinced it was a missile. It came in so fast – it sounded nothing like an airplane.” Don Parkal said, “A bomb had gone off. I could smell the cordite. I knew explosives had been set off somewhere.” Tom Seibert said, “We heard what sounded like a missile.”
 

No crater – no skid marks – no burn marks… (No plane?)

Another interesting point worth mentioning is that in the aftermath of the Pentagon attack, it was reported by media sources that a giant 100 feet crater had been ploughed into the front lawn of the Pentagon as the result of a powerful airliner crash. Photographic evidence overwhelmingly shows that this was absolutely not the case. No crater – no skid marks – no burn marks… (No plane?) Why was the American public and the entire world deliberately misled?

 
Six months after the attacks, when many Americans began to stand up and ask questions concerning the official story of what happened at the heart of the nation’s military establishment, Pentagon officials responded by releasing five fuzzy frames of what they claimed was a 757 plowing into the side of the Pentagon. We were told that a surveillance camera located across from the heliport pad took these photos. However, these five frames seemed to raise more questions than they attempted to answer. First of all, the date code on the first frame was dated September 12, 2001 at 5:37 P.M. That’s one day and eight hours too late. Secondly, the resolution of the frames was so incredibly low that they did not allow for a thorough analysis of the images that we were being shown. Thirdly, the one frame labeled “plane” did not show anything that could even remotely be interpreted as a Boeing 757. Are we truly expected to believe that there was only one security camera capable of capturing the most heinous attack ever carried out against the nucleus of U.S. national defense? Upon further examination of this area of the Pentagon, one can clearly count at least five additional security cameras, two of which were unmistakably aimed directly where the plane would have impacted.
 
It is also worth mentioning that there were three privately owned security cameras all trained in the direction necessary to capture video of the plane hitting the Pentagon. One at a gas station across Interstate 135, one on the rooftop of the Hilton International Hotel and another located at the Virginia Department of Transportation which would have captured the plane descending over Interstate 135. Literally, within only a few minutes after the attack, Federal officials arrived at all three locations and confiscated the videotapes. The contents have never been released to the public.
 

The World Trade Center

Summarizing similar discrepancies relating to the World Trade Center attacks, Marc Bernback, who was described on air as an employee of Fox News, stated on live television that the plane he saw crash into the South Tower came down so low that he could make out the fact that the “commercial airliner” had no windows. This was repeated twice in the same interview. Even the Fox anchorperson asked, “Could these have been cargo planes?” Marc went on to describe a blue, circular logo located on the front of the plane. He also alluded to the fact that this plane, “did not look like it was from around here” speculating that the plane may have come from a military base – not a commercial airport. The producers of “911 In Plane Site” later interviewed Marc Bernback and he stands firmly behind his on-air account. “No windows…”

 “Where is your line in the sand?”

William Lewis started writing music back in the mid 70’s in Shreveport, Louisiana. In the late 80’s he began composing for commercials and documentaries. In the mid 90’s William began producing songs and designing cover art for record labels such as Cobra, USA, Jewel, EMI, Capitol and Susie Q Records. Then later in late 2000 William released a CD entitled Police State, which deals primarily with the loss of constitutional freedoms. He founded PoliceState21.com, a website which concentrates on the loss of civil liberties in the United States. He assisted in creating a daily national news program called TruNews, which he produced and directed. In mid 2003 William founded BridgeStone Media Group and in 2004 BSMG teamed up with Power Hour Productions, in Versailles, Missouri. Together they produce distinctive and hard-hitting expose documentaries on topics ranging from fraud and cover-ups to clear-cut treason.

 Dave vonKleist has spent his career in the broadcasting industry as a professional TV/radio announcer and as a professional vocalist for commercials.Other accomplishments are writing, directing and editing the comedy television show “Spotlight Tonight.” Voted “Best Show” and “Best Directed” show in the Laurel Cable Awards, 1984. He and his wife, Joyce Riley vonKleist presently co-host “The Power Hour,” a radio talk show, and devote most of their time to obtaining assistance for sick Gulf War veterans through the American Gulf War Veterans’ Association in Versailles, Missouri. See www.takebackwashington.com

 

The full text of this article can be found in
Namaste Magazine Vol.7 Issue 2
 
 
911 In Plane Site:
“The must see blockbuster
VIDEO / DVD of the year”
The first 911 film to present undeniable Video Evidence, Not Theories
 
“911 In Plane Site” accomplishes what no other film exposes on September 11th to date. It provides the viewer with a barrage of news clips from a majority of the mainstream news outlets. The official story of that day was reported on live TV by journalists, policemen, firefighters, and other on-the-scene eyewitnesses. However, that footage was shown only once on live television broadcasts in the first hours of the attacks and then… it was never repeated. The official story changed, information was enigmatically omitted, and what can only be described as officially induced propaganda took the place of indisputable reality.
 
 
 
Namaste Publishing  is the UK authorised distributor of ‘911 In Plane Site’ DVD/Video.

We have the ‘official version’ direct from the manufacturer in the USA.
There are reproductions (copies) being sold on the internet that contrevene copyright law
and are not authorised by the Director.
 
 

Don’t miss the opportunity to get
your copy of this revealing film and book

 

‘The Original’ updated DVD/Video:

 

 
 
This article is extracted from
Namaste Magazine Vol 7. Issue 2
PO Box 127, Shrewsbury SY3 7WS
Email: info@namastepublishing.co.uk
 

Comments are closed.